Several readers have complained that we have not been giving Luddites Gazette a fair crack of the whip. So this distribution comes entirely from that journal
1) Socialist leader syndrome 2) Caesar and the Rubicon 3) clothing rights? 4) surveillance next date on schedule: 15-10-2012
Was there some malevolent bug circulating at one of the conferences of European socialists in the past year or two, some infectious agent inducing a general weakness of the will (not to say character) or derangements of normal behaviour? The socialist parties of Europe do not seem to have been having much good fortune lately with their leaders. Partly of course that is their own fault because one and all they elect their leaders, and the wisdom of their electorates must be doubtful. It remains a deep mystery of current European politics that the French were offered Hollande to vote for rather than the intelligent competence of Martine Aubry as a way of ousting the preceding incumbent. This journal can claim no public credit for its private doubts about Hollande before his election, but within a week of his victory we gave our plain opinion that he was not up to the job – poor chap; one should not expect a man fitted to manage the stores in an army camp to direct the nation’s war effort with mastery if he is suddenly handed the baton of the commander-in-chief. Recent polls indicate clearly that the French electorate is rapidly coming to share our view. In England the coalition lurches in disarray from policy error to U-turn to project apparently designed to annoy the voters. A glorious opportunity for the opposition; and it is true that the pollsters believe they have something of a lead over the government. But there is a ball and chain attached to those left legs in the shape of their leader. (One fifth of the popularity rating of his party, and likened in the media, however unfairly, to Mr Bean or the cartoon hero Wallace.) Further to the east, we have Victor Ponta. It is true that we should not count his party as having a socialist tendency simply because of its name. The outstanding example of how that can mislead the innocent was the English Labour Party under Antony Blair. (Not yet properly departed from the scene, by the way, the latter can still be seen, a political zombie in the shadowy outer circles of European politics, doubtless hoping to be brought back to life as president of Europe.) Nevertheless the political party which Ponta leads is proclaimed to be a party of social democrats. One of the more interesting episodes in Romanian politics recently took place when his party organised a referendum with a view to ousting the country’s President, Basescu, from office ahead of time. They failed to get what they were after (and two of the ministers involved in arranging it were sacked) and Ponta has also been having a turbulent time in other ways lately; there have been sharp exchanges with Brussels (which evidently lack the power to leave him trembling). One curiosity was his statement in an interview, reported in El País, 28 June, that he would ‘certainly resign’ if the accusations of plagiarism in his academic career were confirmed. On 30 June the council for academic awards confirmed the accusations of plagiarism and recommended the withdrawal of his doctorate; he refused to resign. Of course he is far from the only politician who has had trouble connecting his remarks with reality. In the past couple of decades it seems to have all but become a part of the job description. ¹ Just the other day vice-presidential candidate Ryan achieved a spectacular gap in his account of his own athletic ability [cf the distribution 22-9-2012]; perhaps we should wonder if ‘terminological inexactitude’, as Churchill put it, is seen as a political virtue – a capacity to break free from constraints imposed by facts. One might hope that either politicians would have enough competence to avoid such ‘mis-speaking’ or their public would turn on them furiously and force them from office.
But to return to the socialist malaise; now in Germany Peer Steinbruck has moved to the centre of the socialist stage and there are muttered questions in the audience. How much of a socialist is he? Is he what his party needs? Do we trust him?
¹ highly recommended:
P.Oborne The rise of political lying The Free Press 2005
M.Dobbs The rise of political fact-checking a report issued by the New America Foundation under a Creative Commons licence on the internet 2012
from Luddites Gazette
Our classical editor reports
A newly discovered manuscript of Pompeius Trogus has thrown a dramatic new light on one of the crucial events of Roman history. In describing the end of the Roman republic he relates that Julius Caesar was sitting in his tent on the evening of 13 January 49 b.p.e. composing the speech in which he was to tell his army to stand down since he was going into retirement from public life in obedience to the instruction of the Senate. Then aides came in with a prisoner, the leader of the group that had been guiding the army on its march back from Gaul. They asked what should be done with him, as a group of soldiers who happened to be natives of this region and were puzzled by the unfamiliar and difficult route he was taking had forced him to confess that he was lost, and had been simply leading the army southwards by relying on guesswork and the sun. It then transpired that Caesar was many miles further south than he had supposed, and the decisive frontier, the Rubicon, was already three days’ march behind him.
from Luddites Gazette
Opinion (anonymity requested)
To take a properly unpopular view, let us consider a major road in a mid-sized city (which it would be invidious to specify as being in Italy, as well as bringing unwelcome recriminations; so I shall not). There is a supermarket on one side of the road, and opposite stands a bus station. Shoppers have the unambiguous right to cross the road between the two. There is a drawback. A little under two hundred metres or so in each direction there is a fairly sharp bend; while drivers keeping to the speed limit will not reach the crossing point after rounding the bend until people on foot have had ample time to reach the other side without hurrying, there are unfortunately not a few reckless drivers who so flagrantly break the limit that they scream past while walkers are still on the roadway. (The police service is badly understaffed.) It goes without saying that such drivers are both breaking the law and showing contempt for proper standards of human behaviour. The risks from their disgraceful actions are appalling and regrettably new arrivals at the bus station do not always get a warning. Few locals decide to make their undoubted right the sole factor in their decision on how to act, specifically how to cross. They use the pedestrian bridge.
Now consider feminists who insist on their right to walk where they like wearing (or to a certain extent not wearing – and absolutely no moral judgment is being made) the clothes they choose, without risk of sexual assault. Let it be said that they have an unquestionable right to do so. Let it also be said in the plainest terms that all forms of sexual assault are disgraceful, and in cases where the assault is on a woman it will be distressing in a way which men cannot genuinely comprehend. It would still be wise to accept a parallelism with the (not necessarily Italian) highway, and to take factors – no matter how deplorable – other than their rights into account in deciding on their actions.
from Luddites Gazette
from Readers’ letters (nb this letter has been abridged)
Is there any truth in the rumour that a certain government in the European Union has awarded a secret contract to a company said to have close links to the Chinese government? The goal is said to be to enable its security ministry, also known as the Home Office, to trawl the internet discovering which of its citizens never play online computer games, never connect to YouTube, and appear to be members of no contact groups or social networks, on the grounds that such individuals are abnormally non-conformist and should be investigated to see if there is any sign of links to terrorist activities. An official with responsibility for security recently spoke publicly of being worried about ‘a grey border area between mere eccentricity and dangerous anti-social activities’.
Our editor replies: You may not need, at this stage, to sell up and emigrate. Officials at many levels in most governments are scheming in this sort of way most of the time, but it seldom results in any great acceleration of the onward goosestep of authoritarianism beyond the speed produced by piecemeal advances at ‘jobsworth’ level, which seem to be an inbuilt feature of human society. In fact encroachment by tyranny looks like an inescapable development, seldom if ever rewound to any significant extent except by foreign conquest or by major natural disaster.
As it happens, however, we received your letter only two days before the announcement in Britain of a new plan intended to make access to certain welfare allowances and government services (including activities, such as driving or watching television, which are ruled to be illegal until you pay the government a fee for a licence to do them) available online. This is another way of saying that the intention is to reduce access to those allowances and services for those who do not or cannot apply online. My guess – my confident prediction – is that those who ‘choose’ to apply in person will be required to report between 11 a.m. and 4 p.m. on weekdays, with all relevant paper documentation (originals only, no photocopies), to a centralised government ‘service’ site in southwest Cornwall, to be operational by 2015.
My personal assistant has just informed me that the Citizens Advice non-governmental organisation has reported (to the British Parliament) an estimate that fourteen million people in that country, including many with physical or mental disabilities or low education or language difficulties, lack the capacity to make effective use of the internet. Are these people just to be thrown overboard by those who can take advantage of the electronic advances, to allow the ship of state management to add a tenth of a knot in its race to the future (or bankruptcy)?
from Luddites Gazette
Thought for the day
Honesty has wings, but lives in a cage in the king’s palace
from Luddites Gazette
honor honestique floreant